il Fatto Quotidiano, 28 gennaio 2011
“Berlusconi non rispetta gli altri”. Per questo “ Michele Santoro , Barbara Spinelli e Marco Travaglio hanno deciso di lanciare un appello. Il 13 febbraio senza bandiera e simboli dei partiti saremo davanti al tribunale di Milano per manifestare in difesa del lavoro della magistratura e dei valori di indipendenza e autonomia che sono fondanti nella nostra Costituzione”. Lo ha annunciato il conduttore di Annozero nel corso della conferenza stampa convocata alla Fnsi dopo le polemiche seguite alla puntata last night, which opened with a clash between the live conductor and the director general of RAI, Mauro Masi . "This is an appeal - said the journalist - to underline the level of emergency from information gained in this country and all the powers which should be autonomous from political power. We only want to do as journalists, as the magistrates in Milan who want to believe only the judges. "
"Yesterday's was our fifth performance for listening, but is actually the first when considering the current state of television," said Santoro. "At the time of Samarkand There were films that were 12 million viewers, which does not happen today, so today the specific gravity of the talk show has grown tremendously since then. Remove a transmission as Annozero would make a great gift to the competition. "
"That the prime minister calling for the closure of a program like ours is an incredible invasion of the field. Then he asked to intervene by Autorithy which has members in it decided by the government: it is the perversion of democracy, "said Santoro, asking the Regulatory Commission to intervene because the rules are given to politicians and their actions in transmission.
"There is a path a war that seems pretty obvious with the aim to remove the few, two or three transmissions have not yet been controlled, "said Marco Travaglio " the manifestation of February 13 before the court in Milan is very similar to that of 2002 when the circle was organized in defense of the judiciary but - still - there is a difference today: the world of information that is not more outraged, as then, today the Tg and most of the newspapers, and prefer to water down everything so you do titles where you never understand who is the aggressor and who the attacked. It almost always read titles such as: 'Clash of Masi and Santoro' or 'Clash of Berlusconi and the judiciary'. "
Then it was the turn of Roberto Natale, president of Fnsi, citing the case of the first phone call to The Infidel then Prime Minister's call in program Masi Santoro: "You can call a spade a spade? - Application to the audience - There is a clear pattern that leads to censorship. "
"We have reached a point of indecency, testified by phone yesterday evening, the director general of RAI," said the secretary of Fnsi Franco Siddi. "The country is experiencing a period exasperated that belongs to the strong interests that are all around the Power di governo e al potere di controllo sul sistema televisivo”.
Ma mentre Santoro lancia la sua iniziativa del 13 febbraio arriva, c’era da aspettarselo, la ritorsione del ministro delle Comunicazioni Paolo Romani. Romani invia una lettera al presidente dell’Autorità garante per le comunicazioni, Corrado Calabrò, e “lamenta violazioni da parte del conduttore di Annozero agli obblighi derivanti dal contratto di servizio”.
Precisa poi il ministro di aver inviato la stessa missiva al presidente della Commssione di Vigilanza sulla Rai, Sergio Zavoli , e al presidente del Cda della tv di Stato, Paolo Garimberti, dove si legge: “E’ il caso di valutare la possibilità to activate the powers of examination and instructors in art. 48 TU, cit. And any further action pertaining respectively - continues - it has happened that during the broadcast of the program Annozero of 20 and 27 January (just those dedicated to the case Ruby and Berlusconi, ed ) is is a lot of room to claims of a free nature, offensive and seriously damaging to the dignity and decorum of prominent political figures, which were uttered by persons involved in the investigation by the prosecutor of the judiciary. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment